Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-10-20 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Black, Purple and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50s has a global score of 86.6, which is slightly better than Google Pixel 3a's 78.8 global score. The Samsung Galaxy A50s construction is heavier but just a little thinner than the Google Pixel 3a, and they were released only 6 months apart. These phones come with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A50s has an older 10 version and Google Pixel 3a has Android 11 version.
Galaxy A50s counts with a little better performance than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy A50s also has a larger amount of RAM. Google Pixel 3a has a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2220 pixels, it also counts with a just a bit better display pixel density.
Samsung Galaxy A50s takes better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low-light photography and video, and they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also counts with a way higher resolution back facing camera and a much larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Samsung Galaxy A50s has a much better memory to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and an external memory card slot that allows up to 512 GB. The Galaxy A50s features longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.