Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-20 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50s is a little bit better than the Google Pixel 4, getting a overall score of 86.6 against 81.9. Even though the Galaxy A50s and Google Pixel 4 were released only 0 months apart, Galaxy A50s's construction is a bit thinner but also just a bit heavier. Google Pixel 4 features a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A50s. Both of them have 8 cpu cores and the same RAM memory amount.
The Google Pixel 4 counts with a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2280 pixels and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixels quantity in each inch of screen. Samsung Galaxy A50s features a lot bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 4, because it has 128 GB internal storage and an external memory card slot that admits up to 512 GB.
Galaxy A50s counts with a superior battery life than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 43% more battery capacity. Galaxy A50s shoots much better videos and photos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A50s also counts with a much larger sensor providing a lot better image quality and a back camera with a lot higher 48 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.