Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-20 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50s is a bit better than Google Pixel 4 XL, having a general score of 86.6 against 82.9. Samsung Galaxy A50s's body is somewhat lighter and a bit thinner than Google Pixel 4 XL, although they were released with only a couple months difference. Google Pixel 4 XL features a bit superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A50s. They have a 6 GB RAM memory and a Octa-Core CPU.
The Google Pixel 4 XL features a little bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 3040 pixels and a higher pixel density. Galaxy A50s takes much clearer photos and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low-light photos and videos, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same video definition, the Galaxy A50s also counts with a much higher resolution camera in the back and a much bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with a much bigger storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB and more internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy A50s has a bit better battery duration than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has an 8% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.