Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-20 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Just black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50s has a global score of 86.6, which is a bit better than the Google Pixel 4a's 82.9 overall score. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy A50s has an older 10 version and Google Pixel 4a has Android 11. Samsung Galaxy A50s is an older and somewhat heavier phone than the Google Pixel 4a, but Samsung managed to make it a little bit thinner anyway.
The Samsung Galaxy A50s has a bit more powerful processor than Google Pixel 4a. Both of them have the same RAM amount and 8 cpu cores. Google Pixel 4a counts with just a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Google Pixel 4a also counts with a quite higher pixels density.
The Galaxy A50s has a better camera than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for capturing images and videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Galaxy A50s also counts with a camera with a much better resolution and a much larger back camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality.
The Galaxy A50s has much more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A50s also has an external SD slot that admits up to 512 GB. The Galaxy A50s counts with improved battery performance than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.