Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-20 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 is slightly better than Galaxy A50s, getting an 89 score against 86.6. Google Pixel 5 is a newer and just a bit lighter device than Galaxy A50s, but it's just a little bit thicker. The Google Pixel 5 counts with a little more vivid display than Galaxy A50s, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Google Pixel 5 also counts with a quite higher screen density.
The Google Pixel 5 has just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A50s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 5 also has 2 GB more RAM. The Galaxy A50s counts with a much better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 5, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy A50s also has an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
The Galaxy A50s captures much better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low-light photography and videos and lower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A50s also counts with a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor taking way higher quality videos and photographs and a way more megapixels back camera.
Google Pixel 5 features a bit superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has a 2 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.