Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 12 |
| 2019-10-20 | 2022-07-21 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 5.99 x 2.83 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass, Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 449.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 431 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Tensor (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G78 MP20 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4410mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50s is better than Google Pixel 6a, with an 86.6 score against 76.4. The Galaxy A50s is an incredibly older cellphone than Google Pixel 6a, but it is somewhat thinner and a little bit lighter anyway. Both of these phones have Android OS, but Galaxy A50s has the previous 10 version while Google Pixel 6a has Android 12.
The Galaxy A50s counts with a slightly better screen than Google Pixel 6a, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a bit less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a little bit bigger display. Galaxy A50s counts with a much better storage capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 6a, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A50s also has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
The Galaxy A50s features a much more powerful CPU than Google Pixel 6a, and although they both have a 6 GB RAM, the Galaxy A50s also has 2 more CPU cores. The Google Pixel 6a has a bit superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has a 4410mAh battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with a superior camera than Google Pixel 6a, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low light photos and video and worse video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also counts with a camera in the back with a way higher 48 MP resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.