Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 5.0 |
| 2019-10-20 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 403 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50s is much better than the HTC One M9, having a overall score of 86.6 against 77.7. Galaxy A50s's design is a lot newer and extremely thinner, but also just a little heavier than the HTC One M9. These phones include Android OS, but Galaxy A50s has newer 10 version while HTC One M9 has Android 5.0.
HTC One M9 has a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because although it has a bit lower 1920 x 1080 resolution and a way smaller display, it also counts with a quite greater pixel density. HTC One M9 has just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A50s, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, and they both have 8 cpu cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a 64-bit processing unit and an additional graphics processing unit.
The Samsung Galaxy A50s has much more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than HTC One M9, because it has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB and 96 GB more internal memory. Galaxy A50s has a better camera than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A50s also has a bigger camera aperture for better captures and video in poorly lited situations, a larger sensor capturing higher quality pictures and a lot more MP back camera.
The Galaxy A50s counts with a much longer battery duration than HTC One M9, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 2840mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.