Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-20 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 403 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50s has a global score of 86.6, which is better than the HTC U Ultra's overall score of 77. Galaxy A50s is a a lot newer phone, and it's also just a little bit thinner and a little lighter than HTC U Ultra. HTC U Ultra counts with a bit sharper screen than Galaxy A50s, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a greater screen pixels density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560.
HTC U Ultra features just a bit more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A50s, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy A50s features a little better processing power than HTC U Ultra, because it has a larger amount of RAM and 4 more CPU cores.
The Galaxy A50s shoots much better pictures and videos than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for shooting images and videos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A50s also counts with a bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a back-facing camera with much more MP.
Galaxy A50s has greater battery life than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 33% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.