Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-20 | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 403 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50s is better than HTC U11, with an 86.6 score against 77.6. Samsung Galaxy A50s is a notably newer cellphone, and it's also a little thinner and just a little lighter than the HTC U11. HTC U11 has a processor that is just as good as the Galaxy A50s one, and although the HTC U11 has less RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
The HTC U11 counts with a little bit better looking display than Galaxy A50s, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution. The Galaxy A50s counts with a way bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than HTC U11, because it has 64 GB more internal memory and an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
The Galaxy A50s features superior battery lifetime than HTC U11, because it has a 33 percent larger battery size. The Samsung Galaxy A50s features a better camera than HTC U11, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for low-light photos and videos, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also counts with a back facing camera with much more mega pixels and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.