Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-10-20 | 2016-03-31 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 5.88 x 2.91 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 5.61 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 499.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 554 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50s is better than the LG G5, having an 86.6 score against 76.1. Galaxy A50s's design is a lot newer than LG G5's, although it's just a little bit thicker and just a little bit heavier. Both of these devices use Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A50s has the previous 10 version and LG G5 has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
Galaxy A50s features a little better performance than LG G5, because it has a greater amount of RAM memory and a higher number of cores. The LG G5 features a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560px resolution and a better display density.
Galaxy A50s features a bigger memory to store more apps and games than LG G5, because although it has a SD card slot that holds 1,45 TB smaller, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Galaxy A50s has a much longer battery lifetime than LG G5, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A50s takes much better photos and videos than LG G5, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also counts with a way bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a much better 48 mega pixels resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.