Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2019-10-20 | 2018-11-09 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Black and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50s is better than the LG G7 Fit, getting a global score of 86.6 against 77. Both devices in this comparison review work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A50s has the previous 10 version and LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo version. The Galaxy A50s is a newer and a little thinner cellphone than the LG G7 Fit, although it's also a little heavier.
LG G7 Fit has a better screen than Galaxy A50s, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 3120 resolution and a better pixel number in each inch in the display. The Samsung Galaxy A50s features a greater storage capacity for games and applications than LG G7 Fit, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds 1,45 TB smaller, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A50s has a little bit better hardware performance than LG G7 Fit, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and more cores. The Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with a better camera than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also has a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low light photos and video, a much larger back-facing camera sensor and a way better resolution camera.
Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with longer battery life than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.