Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-10-20 | 2019-07-02 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.11 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.38 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Mirror black, Mirror teal and Mirror white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2248 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3550mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50s is slightly better than the LG G8S ThinQ, having a global score of 86.6 against 82.5. Even when the Galaxy A50s and the LG G8S ThinQ were released only 4 months apart, the Galaxy A50s is just a bit lighter and a little thinner. These phones use Android OS, but Galaxy A50s has older 10 version and LG G8S ThinQ has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The LG G8S ThinQ features a bit better looking display than Galaxy A50s, although it has a quite lower pixel number in each inch in the screen, a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2248 and a little bit smaller display. LG G8S ThinQ counts with a very superior storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy A50s, and although they both have equal internal storage, the LG G8S ThinQ also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB.
LG G8S ThinQ has a bit better performance than Galaxy A50s. Both have a 6 GB RAM and a Octa-Core processing unit. Samsung Galaxy A50s features a better camera than LG G8S ThinQ, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture and lower video frame rates, and they both have the same video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also counts with a back camera with a much better 48 megapixels resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with a bit longer battery lifetime than LG G8S ThinQ, because it has a 13 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.