Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-10-20 | 2019-11-01 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Aurora black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50s is slightly better than LG G8X ThinQ, having an 86.6 score against 82.7. The Galaxy A50s design is lighter and a little bit thinner than the LG G8X ThinQ, although they were only released with a couple months difference. These phones work with the same Android 10 OS (Operating System).
LG G8X ThinQ counts with a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A50s. They have exactly the same 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, a same size display and the same display density. The LG G8X ThinQ counts with a much better memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy A50s, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the LG G8X ThinQ also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG G8X ThinQ features a little faster CPU than Galaxy A50s. Both of them have a 6 GB RAM memory and a Octa-Core CPU. LG G8X ThinQ's battery lifetime is very similar to the battery life in Galaxy A50s. Samsung Galaxy A50s has a much better camera than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rates and a smaller aperture which is not nice for taking photographs or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also counts with a camera in the back with way more MP and a much larger back camera sensor taking lot better quality pictures and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.