Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-10-20 | 2020-11-23 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Blue, Red and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50s has an overall score of 86.6, which is much better than the LG K52's general score of 76. Even though the Samsung Galaxy A50s is older than LG K52, it's body is lighter and just a bit thinner. These phones have the same Android 10 operating system, so you shouldn't see any difference in that aspect.
Galaxy A50s counts with just a bit better processing power than LG K52, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A50s also has 2 GB more RAM memory. Galaxy A50s features a sharper display than LG K52, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a way better pixel density and a lot better 1080 x 2340 resolution.
LG K52 has slightly more storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy A50s takes better pictures and videos than LG K52, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for capturing photographs or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same camera sensor size and a same resolution back-facing camera, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also counts with a much better (4K) video quality.
The Galaxy A50s and the LG K52 feature incredibly similar battery performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.