Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-10-20 | 2020-11-27 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Sky Blue and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 28.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50s has an overall score of 86.6, which is much better than the LG K62's global score of 78.2. Samsung Galaxy A50s is an older phone than the LG K62, but Samsung managed to make it just a bit thinner and lighter. Both of these phones use the same Android 10 OS, so both of them should count with identical operating system features.
The Samsung Galaxy A50s features a better screen than LG K62, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a lot better 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a way greater pixels count per inch of display. LG K62 has much more memory for apps and games than Galaxy A50s, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the LG K62 also has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with a little better performance than LG K62, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A50s and LG K62 count with incredibly similar batteries. Galaxy A50s captures better pictures and videos than LG K62, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have a camera with a 48 mega-pixels and the same sensor size, the Galaxy A50s also counts with a way better (4K) video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.