Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-10-20 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Titan gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50s has a global score of 86.6, which is slightly better than LG K92's score of 85.4. Both phones in our current comparison use the same Android 10 OS (Operating System), so both of them should provide the user identical OS features. Although Galaxy A50s is older than the LG K92, it's construction is just a bit thinner and lighter.
Galaxy A50s features a bit faster processor than LG K92. Both of them have 8 CPU cores and a 6 GB RAM. Galaxy A50s counts with a little bit better display than LG K92, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a quite higher quantity of pixels per inch of display.
LG K92 captures a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy A50s, and although they both have the same video resolution, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and a same size sensor, the LG K92 also has a larger aperture and a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels. LG K92 has a much better memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A50s, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the LG K92 also has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG K92 and Galaxy A50s count with really similar battery performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.