Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-10-20 | 2020-05-07 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Mirror black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2310 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 398 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50s has a general score of 86.6, which is much better than the LG Q70's global score of 77.9. These devices come with the same Android 10 OS, so you shouldn't see any difference in that aspect. Galaxy A50s is a just a bit thinner and somewhat lighter cellphone than LG Q70, even though both of them were released only 7 months apart.
The Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with just a little better performance than LG Q70, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy A50s has a little bit better screen than LG Q70, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also has a little bit better pixels amount per display inch and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px.
The Samsung Galaxy A50s has a slightly better camera than LG Q70, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also counts with a back facing camera with lot more megapixels and a way larger sensor capturing lot better quality videos and photos.
The LG Q70 features slightly more memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG Q70's battery performance is just as good as the battery duration in Samsung Galaxy A50s.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.