Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-10-20 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50s has a global score of 86.6, which is just a bit better than LG V30S ThinQ's score of 82.5. Both phones we compare here have Android OS, but the Galaxy A50s has the older 10 version and LG V30S ThinQ has Android 8.0 Oreo version. The Galaxy A50s construction is newer, but a little thicker and just a little bit heavier than LG V30S ThinQ.
LG V30S ThinQ counts with a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A50s. Both of them have a Octa-Core CPU and the same RAM memory amount. LG V30S ThinQ has a little more vivid screen than Galaxy A50s, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch of screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880.
The LG V30S ThinQ has much more storage to install applications and games than Galaxy A50s, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy A50s has a better camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low-light captures, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Galaxy A50s also counts with a way more megapixels camera and a lot larger sensor.
Samsung Galaxy A50s features longer battery life than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.