Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-10-20 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50s has a general score of 86.6, which is a little bit better than LG V40 ThinQ's 81.2 overall score. Galaxy A50s is a just a little bit lighter phone than LG V40 ThinQ, but they are 0.3inches thick. Both of these phones work with the same Android 10 OS, so they should provide you the same operating system features.
The LG V40 ThinQ has just a little better processing power than Galaxy A50s. Both of them have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core CPU. LG V40 ThinQ features a bit sharper screen than Galaxy A50s, and although they both have a display with the same size, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a better resolution of 1440 x 3120 and a greater amount of pixels per inch in the display.
Samsung Galaxy A50s captures better pictures and videos than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has slower video frame rate and a lot smaller aperture which is not nice for low light captures and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also counts with a much bigger back camera sensor and a way better 48 megapixels resolution back camera.
The LG V40 ThinQ features a slightly bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A50s, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy A50s counts with longer battery performance than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.