Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-20 | 2020-03-20 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Blue and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ has a score of 87.6, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A50s's overall score of 86.6. LG V60 ThinQ is a thicker and notably heavier cellphone than Samsung Galaxy A50s. Both phones in this comparison review include Android OS (operating system), but LG V60 ThinQ has the newer 11 version and Samsung Galaxy A50s has Android 10 version, so it offers some extra features and some performance improvements.
The LG V60 ThinQ has a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy A50s, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG V60 ThinQ also has more RAM memory. LG V60 ThinQ has a display that's just as good as the Samsung Galaxy A50s one, because although the LG V60 ThinQ has a quite worse count of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2460 pixels resolution and a little larger display.
LG V60 ThinQ has a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A50s, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V60 ThinQ has better battery duration than Galaxy A50s, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy A50s shoots much clearer photos and videos than LG V60 ThinQ, although it has a back-facing camera with a way lower 48 MP resolution, a tinier aperture which is not recommended for capturing images or video in poorly lited environments, a much lower 3840x2160 video resolution and a smaller back camera sensor which provides a lower photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.