Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-20 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet is a little bit better than the Galaxy A50s, having a overall score of 87.1 against 86.6. Although the LG Velvet is better than Galaxy A50s, it must be told that it's also just a little bit thicker and a bit heavier. LG Velvet's CPU is just as good as the processing unit in Samsung Galaxy A50s, both of them have 8 cpu cores and 6 GB of RAM.
LG Velvet features a display that's just as good as Samsung Galaxy A50s's screen, because although the LG Velvet has a quite worse pixels count in each screen inch, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2460 pixels resolution and a little bit larger screen. Galaxy A50s features a bit better camera than LG Velvet, although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for low-light photos and videos, they both have the same video frame rates, the same video resolution, the same back-facing camera sensor size and a 48 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera.
LG Velvet has a lot bigger memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A50s, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the LG Velvet also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB. LG Velvet counts with a little longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has an 8% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.