Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 12 |
| 2019-10-20 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.02 x 2.80 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Aqua Foam, Black Onyx, Ice Palace and Very Peri |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 418 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4020mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50s has an overall score of 86.6, which is just a bit better than Motorola Edge 30 Neo's general score of 83.1. Galaxy A50s's design is just a bit thinner than the Motorola Edge 30 Neo, but it's a little heavier and was released 3 years before. Both phones we are comparing work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A50s has older 10 version and Motorola Edge 30 Neo has Android 12.
Galaxy A50s has a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 30 Neo. They have a Octa-Core processor and 6 GB of RAM memory. Galaxy A50s and Motorola Edge 30 Neo count with similar displays, because although the Motorola Edge 30 Neo has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little greater pixel quantity in each inch in the display.
Galaxy A50s has a little bit better camera than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, because although it has a much worse resolution back camera and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for shooting images or videos in low light environments, it also counts with a way better video quality. The Galaxy A50s features a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A50s also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 512 GB.
The Motorola Edge 30 Neo counts with a battery duration that is very similar to Samsung Galaxy A50s's battery lifetime, although the Motorola Edge 30 Neo also has a 0% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.