Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-10-20 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a global score of 87.1, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy A50s's 86.6 overall score. Both phones in this comparison include Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has newer 14 version while Galaxy A50s has Android 10 version, so it provides you lots of additional features and performance enhancements. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's design is much newer than Galaxy A50s's, although it is somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a better screen than Galaxy A50s, because although it has a little inferior quantity of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little bit bigger display. Galaxy A50s counts with a much faster CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A50s, and although they both have the same video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has better video frame rate, a bigger diafragm aperture to take better photography and videos in poorly lited situations, a back-facing camera with more megapixels and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features just a bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.