Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 13 |
| 2019-10-20 | 2023-06-02 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.41 x 2.91 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Cosmic Black and Rose Champagne |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 SM6450 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 600 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | -- |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50s is better than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), getting a score of 86.6 against 76. Both of these phones include Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A50s has older 10 version and Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) has Android 13. The Samsung Galaxy A50s is an much older device than the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), but Samsung managed to build it lighter and thinner.
Samsung Galaxy A50s has a bit better display than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2340px resolution and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little greater screen density. Samsung Galaxy A50s has a bit bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 512 GB.
The Galaxy A50s counts with a much powerful CPU than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023). Both of them have a 6 GB RAM memory and the same number of cores. The Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) has improved battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A50s has just a bit better camera than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), because although it has a lower 3840x2160 video resolution, a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for shooting images and/or video in low light situations and a back facing camera with lesser MP, it also counts with a way bigger sensor capturing lot better quality videos and photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.