Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-10-20 | 2021-04-27 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.94 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Dynamic Grey and Frosted Champagne |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2230 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (360 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50s has an overall score of 86.6, which is just a bit better than the Moto G60's 79.5 global score. Even though the Galaxy A50s is older than the Moto G60, it's construction is extremely thinner and incredibly lighter. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A50s has the previous 10 version and Moto G60 has Android 11 version.
The Galaxy A50s counts with just a bit better processing power than Moto G60, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy A50s also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with a little more vivid screen than Moto G60, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch in the screen.
The Moto G60 counts with a bit better camera than Galaxy A50s, and although they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rate, the Moto G60 also has a bigger aperture and a camera in the back with a much higher 108 mega pixels resolution. The Galaxy A50s counts with just a bit more storage to install games and applications than Moto G60, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits 512 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory.
Moto G60 counts with a superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.