Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-10-20 | -- |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Iced Mint and Ink Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | MediaTek Helio G95 MT6785V/CD chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50s is slightly better than the Motorola Moto G60s, having an 86.6 score against 79.9. Both devices we compare here work with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A50s has the previous 10 version while Motorola Moto G60s has Android 11. Samsung Galaxy A50s is a way thinner and notably lighter device than the Motorola Moto G60s.
The Galaxy A50s counts with a little better processing power than Motorola Moto G60s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A50s also has 2 GB more RAM. Samsung Galaxy A50s has just a bit better screen than Motorola Moto G60s, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixel amount in each inch of screen.
The Galaxy A50s captures a little bit better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto G60s, although it has a camera in the back with way less mega-pixels resolution, a tinier aperture which is not nice for low light photography and video and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution. Motorola Moto G60s counts with just a bit more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy A50s, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Motorola Moto G60s also has an external memory slot that holds up to 1 TB.
Motorola Moto G60s features longer battery duration than Galaxy A50s, because it has a 25% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.