Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-10-20 | 2019-02-07 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Blue and Red |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2270 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50s is better than Moto G7 Plus, getting an 86.6 score against 76.1. The Samsung Galaxy A50s body is just a little thinner and a little lighter than the Moto G7 Plus, even though both of them were released with only a couple of months difference. Both phones we compare here come with the same Android 10 OS, so both of them should count with all the same operating system features.
The Galaxy A50s counts with a bit better processing power than Motorola Moto G7 Plus, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy A50s also has more RAM memory. Galaxy A50s has a little bit better looking screen than Moto G7 Plus, because although it has a little lower pixels quantity in each inch of screen, it also counts with a quite larger display and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340px.
The Samsung Galaxy A50s features a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Moto G7 Plus, and although they both have a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also has more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with greater battery duration than Moto G7 Plus, because it has a 33% larger battery capacity.
The Galaxy A50s counts with a superior camera than Moto G7 Plus, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low-light captures and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A50s also counts with a back camera with lot more mega-pixels and a lot bigger sensor capturing way better quality photographs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.