Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 13 |
| 2019-10-20 | 2023-09-14 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | -- |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Marshmallow Blue, Midnight Blue and Viva Magenta |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | -- |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50s has a general score of 86.6, which is a bit better than the Moto G84's 80.9 overall score. These phones use Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A50s has the older 10 version and Moto G84 has Android 13. The Samsung Galaxy A50s construction has the same thickness than Moto G84, but it's incredibly heavier.
Galaxy A50s counts with a way better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G84, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Moto G84 has a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has a little larger screen, a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a little higher display pixel density.
Galaxy A50s captures clearer videos and photos than Moto G84, because although it has a back-facing camera with less megapixels, a way tinier back-facing camera sensor offering a much lower image quality and a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for shooting photographs and videos in low light environments, it also counts with a much better video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy A50s has a little bit better storage capacity to install games and applications than Motorola Moto G84, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Motorola Moto G84 counts with improved battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.