Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-10-20 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50s is better than the Moto Z Force, having an 86.6 score against 75.8. Galaxy A50s's design is much newer, but a little heavier and just a little bit thicker than the Moto Z Force. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A50s has the older 10 version and Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat.
The Moto Z Force counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A50s, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560. Galaxy A50s features just a little better performance than Moto Z Force, because it has 4 more processing cores and a higher amount of RAM.
The Galaxy A50s shoots much better pictures and videos than Moto Z Force, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low-light photos and video, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Galaxy A50s also counts with a back-facing camera with much more mega pixels.
The Moto Z Force counts with just a bit bigger storage to install games and applications than Galaxy A50s, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy A50s has just a little better battery life than Moto Z Force, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.