Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-20 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) has a global score of 87, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A50s's general score of 86.6. The Motorola razr (2020) design is newer, but a little bit thicker and heavier than Samsung Galaxy A50s. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola razr (2020) has 11 version while Samsung Galaxy A50s has Android 10, giving a couple additional features.
The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A50s, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy A50s features just a bit better display than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a slightly higher 1080 x 2340px resolution, a just a little more pixels per display inch and a little bit bigger screen.
The Motorola razr (2020)'s camera is very similar to the Samsung Galaxy A50s one, and although the Motorola razr (2020) has a larger aperture for better photos in poorly lited situations, they both have a same size sensor, the same (4K) video definition, the same video frame rate and a same resolution camera.
Galaxy A50s counts with a little bit better storage capacity for apps and games than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy A50s features a really longer battery duration than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 43% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.