Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 12 |
| 2019-10-20 | 2022-08-18 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.57 x 3.14 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50s is a little bit better than the Motorola razr (2022), with an 86.6 score against 81.1. Both phones in this comparison come with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A50s has older 10 version while Motorola razr (2022) has Android 12. Samsung Galaxy A50s is a somewhat lighter phone than the Motorola razr (2022), but both are equally thin.
The Motorola razr (2022) counts with a bit better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A50s, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Motorola razr (2022) also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Motorola razr (2022) has just a bit better screen than Galaxy A50s, because although it has a just a little lower count of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a little bit bigger display and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400.
Samsung Galaxy A50s shoots a bit better pictures and videos than Motorola razr (2022), although it has a worse (4K) video resolution, a smaller camera aperture and a lesser MP back camera. Galaxy A50s features a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola razr (2022), and although they both have equal internal memory, the Galaxy A50s also has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
The Galaxy A50s has a bit longer battery lifetime than Motorola razr (2022), because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.