Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-20 | 2019-03-03 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50s has a score of 86.6, which is much better than the Nokia 9 PureView's global score of 76.4. The Galaxy A50s is a a little thinner and a little lighter phone than Nokia 9 PureView, even when both of them were only released 8 months apart. Nokia 9 PureView has a little more vivid display than Galaxy A50s, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixel density and a better 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution.
The Nokia 9 PureView counts with a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A50s. Both have a 6 GB RAM and a Octa-Core processing unit. The Galaxy A50s features a much better camera than Nokia 9 PureView, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for low light images and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Galaxy A50s also counts with a back facing camera with a lot better resolution and a way bigger back camera sensor capturing lot better quality photographs.
The Galaxy A50s counts with a much greater storage for games and applications than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Galaxy A50s also has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy A50s has better battery lifetime than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.