Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-10-20 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Cyber shade |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50s has a global score of 86.6, which is much better than the nubia Red Magic 3S's global score of 75.8. The Galaxy A50s construction is notably thinner and incredibly lighter than the nubia Red Magic 3S, even though both were released only 0 months apart. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A50s has an older 10 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie.
The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a bit superior CPU than Galaxy A50s, and although they both have 8 cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a higher amount of RAM. Nubia Red Magic 3S features a display that is very similar to the screen in Galaxy A50s, because although the nubia Red Magic 3S has a little less pixels per display inch, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a little bigger display.
Galaxy A50s features a slightly better memory to install applications and games than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 512 GB. Nubia Red Magic 3S has a bit better camera than Galaxy A50s, and although they both have a same resolution back camera and the same sensor size, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a bigger camera aperture to take better photos in low-light environments and a much higher video resolution.
The nubia Red Magic 3S features superior battery duration than Galaxy A50s, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.