Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-10-20 | 2020-09-02 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Sonic silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50s is better than the nubia Red Magic 5S, getting an 86.6 score against 76.2. Both of these phones use the same Android 10 operating system. Although Galaxy A50s is older than nubia Red Magic 5S, it's body is much thinner and a lot lighter. Nubia Red Magic 5S features a bit better processing unit than Galaxy A50s, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a greater amount of RAM.
The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a little bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because although it has a just a little lower display pixel density, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2340, the nubia Red Magic 5S also counts with a little bit bigger display. Nubia Red Magic 5S shoots a bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has a bigger aperture, a bigger sensor providing a better image quality, a camera in the back with lot more megapixels and a way better video quality.
The Galaxy A50s has a much better memory to store more apps and games than nubia Red Magic 5S, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A50s also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 512 GB. The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a little longer battery performance than Galaxy A50s, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.