Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-10-20 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Ocean |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50s has an overall score of 86.6, which is a little bit better than the OPPO Find X2's 79.7 score. Both phones we compare here have the same Android 10 OS, so both of them should provide all the same operating system features. The Galaxy A50s design is somewhat lighter and a bit thinner than OPPO Find X2, although both were released with only 7 months difference.
OPPO Find X2 features a brighter screen than Galaxy A50s, because it has more pixels per inch of display, a bit larger screen and a better 1440 x 3168px resolution. The Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with a little bit more storage capacity for games and applications than OPPO Find X2, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
OPPO Find X2 features a bit superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy A50s, and although they both have 8 cores, the OPPO Find X2 also has 6 GB more RAM memory. The OPPO Find X2 shoots a bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A50s, and although they both have a same size back camera sensor, the same resolution back camera and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the OPPO Find X2 also has a bigger aperture for better images in low light situations and better 60 frames per second video frame rates.
OPPO Find X2 counts with a bit superior battery duration than Galaxy A50s, because it has a 4200mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.