Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-10-20 | 2020-05-21 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Moonlight Black and Starry Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50s has an overall score of 86.6, which is better than the OPPO Find X2 Neo's 77.7 score. Galaxy A50s is a a little lighter cellphone than OPPO Find X2 Neo, but they are equally thin. Both phones we compare here work with the same Android 10 operating system. The OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with just a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has a bit larger display, a just a little greater display pixel density and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A50s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has 6 GB more RAM. The OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy A50s, and although they both have the same video frame rates, a back facing camera with a 48 MP, the same video definition and a same size back-facing camera sensor, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has a bigger aperture.
The Galaxy A50s counts with slightly more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy A50s and OPPO Find X2 Neo both feature really similar batteries duration, although the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has 4025mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.