Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-10-20 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Ocean |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50s has a score of 86.6, which is a bit better than the OPPO Find X2 Pro's global score of 83.1. These phones come with the same Android 10 OS, so they should provide the same operating system features. The Samsung Galaxy A50s construction is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than OPPO Find X2 Pro, although both were released only 7 months apart.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a little bit better processing power than Galaxy A50s, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has more RAM memory. OPPO Find X2 Pro has a better screen than Galaxy A50s, because it has a little bit bigger display, a better 1440 x 3168 pixels resolution and more pixels per inch of screen.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A50s, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a bit superior battery life than Galaxy A50s, because it has a 4260mAh battery size.
OPPO Find X2 Pro has a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A50s, and although they both have the same video quality and a same resolution back camera, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a larger aperture to capture better low-light captures and video, higher 60 frames per second video frame rates and a much larger back-facing camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.