Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-10-20 | 2021-04-14 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Galactic Silver and Starlight Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 975.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SDM865 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50s is better than OPPO Find X3 Neo, getting a general score of 86.6 against 76. Despite of the fact that Galaxy A50s is older than OPPO Find X3 Neo, it's body is a little thinner and a little lighter. Both phones in our current comparison have Android operating system, but Galaxy A50s has the previous 10 version while OPPO Find X3 Neo has Android 11 version.
OPPO Find X3 Neo has a better looking display than Galaxy A50s, because it has a bit larger screen, a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bit greater screen density. The Samsung Galaxy A50s features just a bit bigger memory to install applications and games than OPPO Find X3 Neo, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds up to 512 GB.
OPPO Find X3 Neo has a bit better processing power than Galaxy A50s, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also has 6 GB more RAM. The OPPO Find X3 Neo features a little better battery life than Galaxy A50s, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. Galaxy A50s shoots a bit better videos and photos than OPPO Find X3 Neo, although it has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a lower 48 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low-light captures and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.