Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-10-20 | 2023-12-16 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Blue Black and Light Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.03 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50s is better than the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, having a global score of 86.6 against 77.4. Both phones in this comparison include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A50s has the previous 10 version and Samsung Galaxy A15 5G has Android 14 version. The Galaxy A50s is an older cellphone than Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, but it is somewhat lighter and just a bit thinner anyway.
The Samsung Galaxy A50s features a much more powerful CPU than Galaxy A15 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also has more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A15 5G has just a bit better looking display than Galaxy A50s, because although it has a just a little inferior pixel quantity in each display inch, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G also counts with a bit bigger screen.
The Galaxy A15 5G has a slightly bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A50s, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A15 5G also has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy A50s shoots much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for taking photographs and videos in low light environments and a lower resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Galaxy A15 5G has improved battery lifetime than Galaxy A50s, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.