Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-10-20 | 2021-06-24 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Gray, Mint, Violet and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50s has a global score of 86.6, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G's score of 84.6. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but the Galaxy A50s has the previous 10 version while Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has Android 11. The Galaxy A50s body is lighter and somewhat thinner than the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, despite of the fact that it was released a little bit further than a year before.
Galaxy A50s counts with a bit superior processor than Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A50s also has a greater amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy A22 5G and Samsung Galaxy A50s count with incredibly similar displays, because although the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has a little lower pixels amount per inch of screen, it also counts with a quite bigger screen and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400.
The Galaxy A50s has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for taking pictures in low light situations, and they both have a 48 megapixels resolution back camera, the Galaxy A50s also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
The Galaxy A50s has a little bit more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has an external memory slot that admits 512 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. Samsung Galaxy A22 5G counts with improved battery duration than Galaxy A50s, because it has a 25 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.