Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-10-20 | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50s is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, getting a overall score of 86.6 against 79.4. The Galaxy A50s is an older device than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, but it is extremely lighter and just a little thinner anyway. Both devices in this comparison review include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A50s has the older 10 version while Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has Android 14.
Samsung Galaxy A50s has a way better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G. Both have 6 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core CPU. Galaxy A35 5G has a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because although it has a little less pixels per inch in the screen, and they both have the same 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a bit bigger display.
The Galaxy A50s captures slightly better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, although it has a smaller aperture, a smaller sensor, a camera in the back with less mega-pixels and a worse 3840x2160 video quality. Samsung Galaxy A50s features a much greater storage for games and applications than Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy A35 5G has superior battery performance than Galaxy A50s, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.