Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 12 |
| 2019-10-20 | 2022-03-22 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | -- |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Aqua Blue and Forest Green |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2408 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50s has an overall score of 86.6, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy F23's score of 84.6. These devices include Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A50s has older 10 version and Samsung Galaxy F23 has Android 12 version. The Samsung Galaxy A50s has a bit better processor than Galaxy F23, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A50s and the Galaxy F23 both have very similar screens, because although the Galaxy F23 has a little bit inferior pixels number per inch in the screen, it also counts with a little bit bigger display and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2408px. Galaxy A50s features a much better camera than Galaxy F23, although it has a worse resolution back-facing camera and a smaller diafragm aperture.
Galaxy A50s has a way bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy F23, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Galaxy A50s also has an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy F23 has superior battery lifetime than Galaxy A50s, because it has a 25% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.