Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-10-20 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold has a score of 97.6, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy A50s's global score of 86.6. Galaxy Fold's body is extremely heavier but a little thinner than Samsung Galaxy A50s, and both of them were released with only a couple months difference. Both phones in our current comparison include Android OS, but the Galaxy Fold has a more recent 9.0 Pie version and Samsung Galaxy A50s has Android 10 version, so it gives a couple additional features.
Galaxy A50s counts with a little bit better looking screen than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a quite higher pixels count in each display inch. The Galaxy Fold features a lot bigger memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy A50s, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy Fold features a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A50s, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has 6 GB more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a bit superior battery lifetime than Galaxy A50s, because it has 4380mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy A50s counts with a much better camera than Galaxy Fold, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rates and a much smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A50s also counts with a way larger sensor providing a lot better image quality and a much better 48 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.