Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-20 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 is a bit better than Galaxy A50s, having a 90.8 score against 86.6. The Galaxy Note 20 body is newer than Galaxy A50s's, but it is heavier and a little thicker. Galaxy Note 20 features a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy A50s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note 20 also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy Note 20 counts with a screen that's just as good as the display in Samsung Galaxy A50s, because although the Galaxy Note 20 has a little less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a bit larger screen and a slightly better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution. The Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with a bit better camera than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a tinier sensor and a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low light images, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also counts with a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution and better video frame rates.
Galaxy A50s counts with a much better memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A50s also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy Note 20 features just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has an 8% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.