Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-20 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a general score of 98.9, which is much better than Galaxy A50s's overall score of 86.6. Even though Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is newer than Galaxy A50s, it's heavier and just a little thicker. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a newer 13 version while Galaxy A50s has Android 10 version.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bit faster processor than Galaxy A50s, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a higher amount of RAM. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has a bit larger screen, a just a little better display density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088px.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a little bit more storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A50s, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has an external memory card slot that holds up to 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a better camera than Galaxy A50s, because it has a much larger back-facing camera sensor providing a much higher image quality, a larger aperture to take better low-light photography, a back camera with way more megapixels and a way better 7680x4320 video resolution.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with just a little better battery performance than Galaxy A50s, because it has a 13 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.