Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 5.1 |
| 2019-10-20 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50s has a global score of 86.6, which is a little bit better than Galaxy Note 5's 79.3 global score. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but Galaxy A50s has 10 version and Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1, offering some nice extra features and performance optimizations. The Galaxy A50s is a just a little lighter phone than Galaxy Note 5, but both are equally thin.
The Galaxy Note 5 has a much better screen than Galaxy A50s, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixel density and a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution. Galaxy A50s features a better processor than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 7 more cores and more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy A50s captures much better photographs and videos than Galaxy Note 5, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also counts with a much better resolution back camera and a lot larger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity and an external SD slot that admits up to 512 GB. Galaxy A50s features greater battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.