Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-20 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 has a score of 89, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A50s's score of 86.6. The Galaxy Note10 is an a bit thicker and just a little heavier device than the Samsung Galaxy A50s. The Galaxy Note10 and Galaxy A50s feature quite similar displays, although the Galaxy Note10 has a quite smaller screen, a just a bit lower pixel density and a little bit lower 1080 x 2280 resolution.
Galaxy Note10 counts with a little better processing power than Galaxy A50s, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Note10 also has a greater amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy A50s takes much better photos and videos than Galaxy Note10, because although it has a lot tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for capturing images and videos in low light situations and slower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also counts with a camera with a way better resolution and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor.
The Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with a slightly bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy Note10, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy A50s features a bit longer battery performance than Galaxy Note10, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.