Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-10-20 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 is a bit better than the Galaxy A50s, having a overall score of 88.3 against 86.6. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but Galaxy S10 has 11 version and Galaxy A50s has Android 10. The Galaxy S10 construction is just a little bit lighter but just a bit thicker than the Galaxy A50s, and both were released with only a couple of months difference.
Samsung Galaxy S10 counts with a bit better performance than Galaxy A50s, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy S10 also has more RAM. Samsung Galaxy S10 counts with a bit sharper screen than Galaxy A50s, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 3040 resolution and a better screen pixel density.
Samsung Galaxy S10's storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos is just as good as Galaxy A50s's one, both of them have equal 128 GB internal storage and an external memory card slot that supports up to 512 GB. Galaxy A50s features superior battery performance than Galaxy S10, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Galaxy A50s captures better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S10, because although it has a lot smaller aperture which is not good for taking photos or video in low-light situations and worse 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same video resolution, the Galaxy A50s also counts with a way bigger camera sensor shooting lot better quality videos and pictures and a back facing camera with way more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.