Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-10-20 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is slightly better than Galaxy A50s, having a score of 93.6 against 86.6. Despite being the best we are comparing here, Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is an a little thicker and somewhat heavier cellphone than the Galaxy A50s. Both of these phones come with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has 11 version while Galaxy A50s has Android 10 version.
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has just a bit better looking display than Galaxy A50s, because it has a just a bit more pixels per inch of display, a little bigger display and a better 1440 x 3040 resolution. Galaxy S10 5G has a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A50s, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S10 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy A50s takes much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has lower video frame rate and a way tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for taking photographs in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also counts with a much more megapixels camera in the back and a lot larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Galaxy A50s counts with a little bit better memory to install applications and games than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports up to 512 GB. Galaxy S10 5G counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than Galaxy A50s, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.