Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-20 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a general score of 98, which is better than Galaxy A50s's overall score of 86.6. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has the newer 13 version while Galaxy A50s has Android 10 version. Although Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a better device than the Galaxy A50s, we must tell that it's also a way heavier and somewhat thicker device.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A50s, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a higher amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A50s, because it has a quite bigger display, a greater pixel density and a better 1440 x 3200 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with just a bit more storage for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A50s, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1000 GB. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features longer battery performance than Galaxy A50s, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G captures much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy A50s, and although they both have a same size camera sensor, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a bigger camera aperture to capture better low-light captures, a way better 7680x4320 video definition and a camera in the back with a way better 108 mega-pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.